On 02/06/2018 10:13, Toerless Eckert wrote: ....
> I don't see why BRSKI can't just define the extra > value that it needs. That doesn't really require an "Updates:" IMHO. Whats your logic for that conclusion ? My logic for thinking that it is an extension is that we're defining something which is not a subset of what GRASP did define. Yes, it's an extension, but does a simple extension require "Updates:"? That is a question that is often asked and never definitively answered. I think the answer can be "no", because a GRASP implementer really shouldn't care about this. My GRASP code certainly doesn't; my toy BRSKI code does. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
