[moving anima list to BCC]

>> [2] https://github.com/YangModels
>
> okay, so at this point, my I think that pulls from YangModels github
> (directly, or wget'ing the rawusercontent file...) is the simplest.

seems sensible.


> Kent, doeds 8366 replace:
>   https://github.com/YangModels/yang/blob/master/standard/ietf/DRAFT\
>   /ietf-zerotouch-ownership-voucher.yang
> ??

Yes.  That module is a stale holdover from back before when we moved the 
voucher module into its own draft, and moved that draft to the ANIMA WG.

Joe/Benoit, maybe the scripts could somehow track modules extracted from I-Ds 
(not RFCs) to see when old modules go away, and then delete those old modules?  
 

Consider this history:
  zerotouch-08 (April 2016) is the last draft to define 
ietf-zerotouch-ownership-voucher
  zerotouch-09 (July 2016) renamed the module to 
"example-zerotouch-ownership-voucher"
  zerotouch-10 (October 2016) no longer had the module at all
  draft-kwatsen-netconf-voucher-00 (October 2016) is when "ietf-voucher" began
  draft-kwatsen-anima-voucher-00 (December 2016) replaced 
draft-kwatsen-netconf-voucher
  draft-ietf-anima-voucher-00 (January 2017) replaced 
draft-kwatsen-anima-voucher
  RFC 8366 (May 2018) replaced draft-ietf-anima-voucher

Kent


_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to