Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > So, and here i can not distinguish my ACP author and WG chair head: > unless some AD tells me how an ACP ops draft could NOT become a normative > reference to the current ACP draft, i will push back against opening > up one now (unfortunately).
A future BCP (not Informational) draft on ACP operation could certainly reference the ACP draft normatively. But, I think you are worrying about the opposite, but the from/to in your sentence is not clear: That some operational BCP would have to be referenced by the ACP draft, which would delay it. My take it that the right answer is to just say less ;-) RFC793 didn't tell us how to do congestion control, just that we needed it. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
