On 06/07/2018 07:06, Toerless Eckert wrote: > Thanks Kent > > Let me forward to the mailing list so it is aware of this information. > > IPR disclosure for that Juniper patent is here, from 2015: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-netconf-zerotouch > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2581/
If somebody believes that is relevant to BRSKI, that somebody needs to file a separate disclosure. > And for reference the ones disclosed explicitly against the bootstrap draft > in 2014/2016: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-pritikin-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2463/ This one isn't of great concern, since it's a reciprocal non-assert declaration. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2816/ This one meets minimal requirements since it is reciprocal RAND, but note that it does *not* declare what the RAND conditions are, and the claims in the patent are fairly wide. Personally I don't think it is a reason to change track, exactly because the claims *are* wide - no minor changes to BRSKI would avoid them, if they are valid at all. But vendors will need to look closely at it. Brian > > Cheers > Toerless > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 03:21:53PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> The following was filed for the NETCONF WG's zerotouch draft: >> >> US Patent Application No. 14/626,382 >> >> link: https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160246617 >> >> >> I didn't think to file it for the voucher draft itself, because the voucher >> draft just sets up the environment. The patent is primarily concerned with >> "offline bootstrapping" (e.g., booting off a USB flash drive), but it may >> have some applicability to this draft. Please review and let me know. >> >> Kent >> >> >> ===== original message ===== >> >> Dear authors of ANIMA draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra >> >> As the document shepherd, i am hereby asking each of you to confirm >> that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance >> with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed? >> >> Currently, there are two disclosures mentioned: >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_ipr_search_-3Fsubmit-3Ddraft-26id-3Ddraft-2Dietf-2Danima-2Dbootstrapping-2Dkeyinfra&d=DwIBAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=9zkP0xnJUvZGJ9EPoOH7Yhqn2gsBYaGTvjISlaJdcZo&m=aUmDyJOX9lAznU-gnIOBXiJ8GWg7vbgP6bIAjQ6jBFE&s=9OhEIj9bViZjDM-VnPjRuJvXrRQEFhT1KoBG7DfTu6E&e= >> >> Hint: >> >> "I am not aware of any IPR against draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra >> that have not already been disclosed" >> >> Is a perfect answer to the question raised by this email (if it is true). >> But remember that you are expected to be aware of all IPR with your name on >> it. >> >> Cheers >> Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
