Thanks, Michael
I ran into this via an RFC that had the emails of contributor listed.
I'll check next week in person wrt. to best current practices with
RFC editor.
Cheers
Toerless
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:09:56AM +0200, Michael H. Behringer wrote:
> Hi Toerless, thanks for the feedback.
>
> No problem with me, I'll move contributors before acknowledgements (makes
> sense). Personally I have no problem adding email addresses behind
> contributors, will need to check with everybody which email address they
> want listed.
>
> Are other ID editors doing the same thing? Just, if we're the first to do
> that, maybe we should check with our AD that this is ok?
>
> Michael
>
>
> On 10/07/2018 04:06, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > (not sure which hat i should wear for this email ... i guess it
> > mostly my personal opinion):
> >
> > Michael (dear editor)
> >
> > One nit fix suggestion for whenever you'll do a rev because of IESG
> > feedback:
> >
> > I have just noticed that some tooling, at least from Jari
> > (http://www.arkko.com/tools/allstats)
> > is also taking contributors into account when listing RFCs. Datatracker
> > does not
> > (yet) do this, but i want to suggest it to them given how i feel that its
> > valuable to more explicitly givecredit to the contributor status (aka:
> > list RFCs someone contributed to on their datatracker personal page).
> >
> > Wrt. to the anima reference model: If would be good if you
> > could put the email address of each contributor in parenthesis behind the
> > contributors name. This should help any parsing tool trying to identify/
> > match contributors. Also, please move the contributors
> > section before the Acknowledgements section - unless you disagree that
> > thats the more appropriate order.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > toerless
--
---
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
