Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > That is so far outside the scope of the autonomic networking > infrastructure application of BRSKI that I don't see why we'd even > mention it. It's a case > that definitely needs to fail hard in the autonomic context.
Actually, the only thing lacking is the sales channel integration.
If the MASA knows the intended owner, then everything works.
> If we want to extend the scope of BRSKI to cover BYOD on insecure WiFi, I
> think that's for some other WG.
I don't know if it's for another WG or not, but Owen's document deals with
this... I'm not sure I'd call it "BYOD", exactly... Bring a not-yet-Owned
Device, that you'd like to Own, and get pOwned. And the WiFi is insecure,
because the device doesn't (yet) have accesss to the secure WiFi.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
