Thanks, Brian I didn't remember if i had written it as an entity (policeman) or a function, so its written as a function.
Yes, i agree. I would be happy for BRSKI if it also said as litte. I was planning to define this function as a YANG procedural call from registry to policy controller in an ANI YANG model. Cheers Toerless On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:23:38AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Toerless, > > I didn't find your admission control "policeman" in the ACP draft. > I did find this: > > > Policies if candidate ACP nodes should receive a domain > > certificate or not, for example based on the devices LDevID as in > > BRSKI. The ACP registrar may have a whitelist or blacklist of > > devices serialNumbers from teir LDevID. > > To me that's all we really need to say in the ACP protocol spec, and we > could say the same thing in BRSKI, but we may need to say more about > how this might work in a future draft. > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > Anima@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima -- --- t...@cs.fau.de _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
