On 02/08/2018 03:52, Alissa Cooper wrote: .... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 6.10.4: > > "The value of the Interface Identifier is left for future definitions." > > I don't understand how this is usable without some definition. I.e., if I > assign every interface ID in my ACP to be 0, it's not going to work. Could you > elaborate about what is expected in this field? >
Why not: The value of the Interface Identifier SHOULD follow [RFC8064]. That would work fine and is a SHOULD to allow for alternatives if there's a good reason. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
