Hi Spencer, On 2018-10-25 15:54, Spencer Dawkins wrote: .... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm confused here ... > > This document describes a first, simple, implementable phase of an > Autonomic Networking solution. It is expected that the experience > from this phase will be used in defining updated and extended > specifications over time. Some topics are considered architecturally > in this document, but are not yet reflected in the implementation > specifications. They are marked with an (*). > > This is true now, but when this document is approved, will it be published > immediately (in which case, this is "truth decay", because it becomes less > true > in the unchanging RFC every time a topic is reflected in implementation > specifications), or will it be held until all the (*)s are stable?
The intention is to publish it now; the (*) items are FFS (for further study) in ITU or ISO speak. Should we make the last sentence explicit?: They are marked with an (*) and are intended for further study. Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
