>3) On the ACP draft, there might be a lot of new text from Toerless in order
> to respond to review comments. This text might need to have a second
> WGLC, and our AD says that we should think about whether or not it
> needs a WGLC.
>
> {I take this to mean that the WG should have a Consensus decision
> as to whether to have a WGLC, which to me means, one might as well
> just have a WGLC}
>
>{and I tuned-out complete on the current charter discussion on page 3,
>where it turned to micromanagement...}
We will do a short second WGLC on ACP when it is ready for another round of
review.
Sheng
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
