Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) <[email protected]> wrote: > I was assuming it was mandatory in the current draft, but I was wrong. As > you suggest it is not clear in the -17 version. I do think that an unsigned > voucher should make it to the MASA, like a signed one would, for > consistency.
okay, I'm glad that we agree that it should be consistent. I'm not convinced it's worth having unsigned pledge requests at all. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
