Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) <[email protected]> wrote: > Gotcha, so you are describing a provisional DTLS connection at the server.
I'm thinking about a Registrar that might be serving both provisional connections and ones that are just renewing LDevIDs, and maybe ones that also serve selected factory installed IDevIDs (a use case which est-coaps caters directly to). > Currently we say that clients need to be authenticated in a DTLS connection > before an EST-coaps request. Do you want to make it more explicit to say > that even though EST allowed for it, EST-coaps does not allow > unauthenticated /crt and /att? We can certainly add that. I'd like to add this. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
