Hello, Materials of the NMRG interim meeting at ETS Montreal, July 2018 are here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2018-nmrg-03/session/nmrg
If you think NMRG should work on a survey on IBN or other proposals, please feel free to send e-mail messages / make your case to the NMRG mailing list ([email protected]) and/or the NMRG chair (me😉). FYI: NMRG will hold a virtual meeting very soon (week 4-8 March) where IBN/other topics of interest could be discussed before IETF 104. Thanks, Laurent. > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Toerless Eckert > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 11:57 > To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Anima] Intent: -> NMRG -> ANIMA -> NMRG -> (ANIMA?)!) Re: > proposed anima charter (was; Re: New work item proposal / agenda request) > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 02:30:43PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Intent was given to us (ANIMA) from NMRG as part of the initial > chater > > > scope. We did include it into the reference model, but we failed > to find > > > enough actionable agreement on what Intent is and what to do about > it. > > > > I thought that we make it out of scope so that SUPA would do the work, > but > > SUPA failed. (I'm reminded by the "POLICY" WG of 20 years ago...) > > Hah. I skipped the SUPA episode because i don't remember if we really > ever made specific decisions in that case as opposed to just observing > it. > > > > We therefore for now would like to punt the next steps of work on > Intent > > > back to NMRG and hope we can make enough progress there to later > bring > > > it back into ANIMA. > > > > Fair enough. I don't know if the charter should refer readers to NMRG. > > Seems the guidance we got in IETF103 was to start short and let > qualified charter reviewers ask for what they feeel missing. Where > qualified charter reviewers would i think be IESG. > > > I also wonder if there are any proprietary efforts to define Intent that > > could be referenced? > > Sure, but for now that collection of information should be done in NMRG. > > > > I had given a more detailed presentation to this effect at the > friday > > > NMRG workshop at IETF101 in Montreal, but somehow i can not find > any > > > slides from that friday meeting. Maybe Laurent can comment were > that > > > NMRG workshop notes are. There where more really good > presentations. > > > > Maybe in the proceedings? I guess there is a youtube video too. > > No, the friday NMRG workshop was hosted at the university, so no > standard IETF video gear was there. Let me ping Laurent directly. > > Cheers > Toerless > > > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh > networks [ > > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT > architect [ > > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on > rails [ > > > > > > -- > > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
