Hi, Eliot & Michael R. Thanks for your email. I confirm your request and also the priority of BRSKI relevant discussion. It would follow just after the WG documents update and WG re-chartering unscrambling. Actually, I agree the discussion of BRSKI next steps is part of WG recharter. We could skip the BRSKI part in the re-chartering unscrambling.
Regards, Sheng > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:35 AM > To: Eliot Lear <[email protected]> > Cc: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Anima] Call for agenda ANIMA @ IETF 104， Prague > > > Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we had a lengthy conversation about BRSKI next steps, and that > we > > should expect to spend some time on this in ANIMA. I think I count at > least > > four drafts that are worth considering, and Michael might have more in > mind: > > > * Draft-vanderstock-anima-constrained-join-proxy > > * Draft-lear-eap-teap-brski > > * Draft-ietf-6tisch-{…} > > > * Draft-fries-anima-brski-async-enroll > {Eliot: Does this document include Oskar's requirements?} > > Additional documents that call on BRSKI: > > * draft-richardson-anima-smarkaklink (formerly > draft-richardson-anima-smartpledge) > -> I have revised slides, and I walk to talka bout them. > I believe that it solves draft-fries-anima-brski-async-enroll as well, > but I haven't read the entire document yet. > > * draft-reddy-dprive-bootstrap-dns-server > * draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery > --> some details are still TBD. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= > IPv6 IoT consulting =- _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
