> > PS, Michael R. & Peter, I am fine to move your WG documents, BRSKI and > > Constrained Voucher into the BRSKI relevant work sub-session with the > > same time length. In that way, you may save some time for other > > relevant discussion you want. > > yes, that's a good idea. I don't need 10 minutes for BRSKI status update. > 5 minutes will do.
I will change the order in the draft agenda, but not re-allocate the time length. You guys are welcome to shorten, not elongate, your own presentation. In that way, we can have more time to discuss at the end of sub-session. > We can't have a substantive conversation about it in ten minutes anyway. > I'd sure like to see some replies to my email last week (BCC'ed to the > reviewers) about the -19 document. > > 3. Potential New Charter Unscrambling - 30 min > 14:20 - 14:50, by co-chairs > > Perhaps we could subdivide this item into three sub-items so that we can be > sure > to get through it? Could Toerless post his slides sooner? > Is the intent for it to be mostly mic line? Yes, mic line would be part of it. The WG should have chance to comment. However, giving the proposed charter has been baked for a long while. This may end up soon. Let's see. Regards, Sheng > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= > IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
