Hi Brian, 

FWIW, you may find some comments to this I-D at: 

* pdf: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07-rev%20Med.pdf
 
* doc: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07-rev%20Med.doc
 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Anima [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Brian E Carpenter
> Envoyé : mardi 16 avril 2019 04:43
> À : Anima WG
> Cc : Liubing (Leo)
> Objet : [Anima] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07.txt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Another update following recent comments. The main changes were
> moving the taxonomy to an appendix, some new examples, and editorial
> improvements. Please send any new comments that you may have to
> [email protected]
> 
> At the moment the authors plan to submit this draft soon to the
> Independent Submissions stream, but we'd be glad to hear any
> alternative suggestions.
> 
> Regards
>    Brian + Bing
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07.txt
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:22:48 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> 
> 
>         Title           : Limited Domains and Internet Protocols
>         Authors         : Brian Carpenter
>                           Bing Liu
>       Filename        : draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07.txt
>       Pages           : 25
>       Date            : 2019-04-15
> 
> Abstract:
>    There is a noticeable trend towards network requirements, behaviours
>    and semantics that are specific to a limited region of the Internet
>    and a particular set of requirements.  Policies, default parameters,
>    the options supported, the style of network management and security
>    requirements may vary.  This document reviews examples of such
>    limited domains, also known as controlled environments, and emerging
>    solutions, and includes a related taxonomy.  It then briefly
>    discusses the standardization of protocols for limited domains.
>    Finally, it shows the needs for a precise definition of limited
>    domain membership and for mechanisms to allow nodes to join a domain
>    securely and to find other members, including boundary nodes.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-limited-domains/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-carpenter-limited-domains-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to