Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-anima-01-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-anima/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The sentence in the first paragraph: "for automated network management and control of networks that are developed, built and operated by professionals." I found the wording "operated by professionals" confusing. Especially this is the first sentence of the charter. It seems to be a cut and paste reversal from the reference model document where it says: "loosely referred to as "professionally managed" networks". The reference model differentiates between managed networks and unmanaged networks. It further differentiates for managed networks between traditional (non-autonomic) networks and autonomic networks. The interpretation is the network does need to managed (by professionals), and then one can introduce autonomic management, due to the additional security and trust issues the autonomic model does not cover. Suggest to use the wording of the reference model document to give context or (I prefer) reuse the wording in the original charter for the first two paragraphs as the original was very clear in scope of use. _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
