Hi Michael, Yes, definitely. This would help. Thanks.
Best regards Steffen > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson > Sent: Sonntag, 2. Juni 2019 22:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Anima] Last Call: > <draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-20.txt> (Bootstrapping Remote Secure > Key Infrastructures > (BRSKI)) to Proposed Standard > > On 2019-05-29 11:06 a.m., Fries, Steffen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As this is the last call, it may not be to late to ask the question. I read > > the draft a couple of times and was stumbling upon the > following: > > > > In Figure 1 of the BRSKI draft, for the communication between the Domain > > Registrar (RA) and the Key Infrastructure (CA), EST is > stated. > >>From my understanding of the description EST as enrollment protocol between > >>an RA and the CA is meant exemplary but not > prescriptive? From the protocol flow for the enrollment itself I understood > BRSKI describes the flow until the Domain Registrar but is > open regarding the protocol applied between the domain registrar and the CA. > It may be EST. > > Yes, it may. I don't think, other than the figure, we say anything else. > Would an "e.g." in the figure help? > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
