> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 4:51 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>
> Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-
> [email protected]; Toerless Eckert <[email protected]>; anima-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-
> keyinfra-22: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
>
> Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (2) Section 5.8.1. The format of the MASA audit log seems
> > underspecified. Is the JSON snippet presented here normative to
> > describe the MASA audit log
> > response?
>
> Yes, it's intended to be normative.
> How can we make it clearer without over-engineering this, remembering
> that this is a PS, not IS, and the proof will be in the running-code.
>
> Would you prefer to used CDDL or something like that to describe it?
CDDL would be very nice, but I have a much lower bar. I would be happy with a
full field list (e.g., I noticed that "version" isn't explained anywhere but
appears in the examples; what's the format of the date?) and a statement that
the log be structured per the JSON example.
Roman
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
