Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: >> And if the consumer needs to fallback to some non-BRSKI mechanism he >> is expected to bootstrap the device via serial console himself? Trying >> to see if I understand the scope limitations explained in Section 9.
> Non-BRSKI operators have to prequalify by showing their knowledge of
> serial port console operations and morse code. (do i have to say
> *kidding* ?)
> How about:
> The zero-touch mechanism presented in this and the ACP document
> represents a signficiant efficiency: it avoids the need to ship devices
> to secure locations to provision them before deployment or to ship
> senior experts to remote and often insecure deployment locations to
> provision devices on-site with mechanisms as antiquated as craft serial
> consoles.
It seems to me that this belongs at the end of 1.0, just prior to 1.1?
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
