Randy Armstrong (OPC) <[email protected]> wrote: > The questions that the OPC WG needs to answer are:
> 1) Can BRSKI meet our requirements?
I think so; there are some details of resale that BRSKI would like to make
out-of-scope for the first document. Some way, we have to deal with it,
and I would actually like feedback from OPC about the parameters of different
solutions here.
> 2) If the answer to 1) is yes then can it work with OPC UA security?
yes, I think so.
is there any open source reference code for the OPC UA security?
> 3) If the answer to 2) is no then do we use TLS or extend our own model
> with something like BRSKI but not BRSKI?
> While I cannot predict how the various participants in the OPC WGs will
> respond to question 3), I do know it would make collaboration a lot
> easier if the answer to 2) was yes.
I think yes.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
