I believe that -30 of BRSKI resolves: 1) comments from Roman. 2) comments from Ben. 3) the YANG DOCTOR review that Alissa pointed to.
Slides posted at for this week's meeting: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-106-anima-sessa-brski-draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-status-slide/ that outline the changes between -24 and -30. [email protected] wrote: > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra/ > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-30 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-30 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-30 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
