Hi Michael, I have not seen a response to Tom Petch’s last email (copied in below).
Thanks, Alissa > Begin forwarded message: > > From: tom petch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of > draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-28 > Date: October 29, 2019 at 7:49:39 AM EDT > To: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]>, Alissa Cooper <[email protected]>, Last Call > <[email protected]>, Dan Romascanu <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > > Michael > > I just saw -29 after my last message and it still needs work. > > Appendix C confuses me. The reference to it from IANA Considerations > suggests that it is Normative but there is nothing in it to say that it > is and my take is that by default it is Informational. > > It contains a YANG module which > - lacks references on import statements > - lacks authors > - lacks copyright > - is not listed in IANA Considerations > - has http: not https: > - has a reference clause with a different title to that of the I-D > - mixes URI and URL > all in 35 lines :-) > > The YANG module in s.3.4 > - references RFC8040 which is not in the I-D References > - references > Voucher Profile for Bootstrapping Protocols > whereas this I-D has a title of > Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI) > - has > // Grouping defined for future usage > whereas the grouping is used in the previous YANG statement which leaves > me puzzled > - lacks YANG reference statements for > leaf proximity-registrar-cert { > i.e. RFC5280, X.690, RFC8446 > - has [RFC8446] which looks like an XML/HTML anchor where a YANG module > must be plain text > > - IANA Considerations does not register either module, 3.4 or Appendix > C, as per RFC6020 s.14 > > - Security Consideratrions does not include the required YANG > considerations which in turn generates further Normative References > > - Appendix A > /The secification/The specification/ > > Tom Petch > On Nov 26, 2019, at 3:29 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Alissa, just a reminder that the -30 draft posted during IETF week > resolves the Yang Doctor issue that you had raised. >
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
