[email protected] wrote: > Title : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructures (BRSKI)
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-39
This version has three changes:
1) clarify text that the voucher_status POST is MUST.
2) clarify text that the enrollment_status POST is MUST.
(Thanks to Rifaat and Owen for noticing that the text could have
multiple interpretations)
3) unmix the runs of the voucher-request, parboiled voucher-request, and
voucher. Captures from two runs were present, so the nonce did not match
between voucher-request+voucher and parboiled-voucher-request.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
