Hi everybody, Comments on the following drafts have been sadly lacking since IETF 106. As a result I have not asked for time on the April 9th agenda, especially since it will be 3 a.m. on April 10th for me.
As a reminder, the base GRASP specification is sitting quietly in the RFC Editor queue waiting for a missing normative reference (the ACP draft). https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-grasp-api This version was based on several reviews and there were no changes requested during IETF 106. I would like to ask for WG Last Call *now* on this draft to see if there is consensus. (It's Informational, like most IETF work on APIs. It is also about to expire; I would rather get some more comments before refreshing it.) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-anima-asa-guidelines https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-anima-grasp-bulk https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-anima-l2acp-scenarios I would really like more feedback on these drafts. The first two are old enough that either the WG should adopt them, or they should be discarded. Without your feedback, nothing will happen. The l2acp draft has just expired, and will be revised shortly. Stay well Brian Carpenter _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
