Hi, IMHO:
> On 14 Apr 2020, at 12:03, tom petch <[email protected]> wrote: > > The IESG approval of this I-D caused me to look again at it:-( > > I note that part of the formal specification is in CDDL and while other DDL - > ASN.1, SMI, YANG - are bracketed with CODE BEGINS CODE ENDS - the CDDL is > not. I suspect that it should be - perhaps a note to the RFC Editor is called > for. Yes. > > In the Security Considerations I encounter MTIM which I suspect should be > MITM (and which needs expanding on first use in s.5). > Editorial. > In the YANG module, I see two references in square brackets which suggests > that they are in XML/HTML and not plain text whereas there is a requirement > for YANG modules to be in plain text so that they can be extracted from the > RFC. Editorial. Thanks for looking! Eliot _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
