As I understand the diff, AcpNodeName seems to be a new extension, not a SubjectAltName extension, but an extension?
I found it difficult, reading RFC5912 to figure out where id-on was located, and I had to go into https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml#smi-numbers-1.3.6.1.5.5.7.0 to see. Throughout 5912, we have: id-pkix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7)} while ACP says: id-pkix FROM PKIX1Explicit-2009 { iso(1) identified-organization(3) dod(6) internet(1) security(5) mechanisms(5) pkix(7) id-mod(0) id-mod-pkix1-explicit-02(51) } ; and while I understand that these are "local" variables, it does make figuring stuff out difficult. May I request that the above link (smi-numbers.xml ) go into a comment? maybe that's not often done. The IANA section is a bit of a clearer pointer, but I sure wish we'd point people straight at the the place we mean by URL. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
