I have no objection. My only caution is that otherName is poorly supported in the open source tool sets, but that is something we could conceivably work on.
Eliot > On 2 Jul 2020, at 15:29, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear WG (ACP author head/hat on) > > ACP Revision -26 introduced a new otherName / AcpNodeName encoding for the > ACP Domain Information > (now call AcpNodeName / acp-node-name). Michael Richardson (and potentially > other) implementors > would like to update implementation to use this new encoding for interop > testing, > which requires allocation of two IANA code points (technically i think only > one is > required for the implementation, but the toolchain would require both if i > understand it > correctly). > > The early allocation process RFC7120 requires to vet the community for > interest in the > early allocation, so pls. chime in with a +1, or if you must a -1 and > explanation. > > I'll do a +1 from the authors side. > > The remaining requirements of RFC7120 for early allocations are AFAIK met. > > Thanks! > Toerless > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
