Thomas has pointed out that the "pinned-domain-cert" and "last-renewal-date"
fields which are defined in RFC8366 are not clearly specified for the
voucher-request.

Neither are needed or appropriate in a voucher-request.
I have edited the YANG to include:

      refine "voucher/pinned-domain-cert" {
        mandatory false;
        description "A voucher-request field
                     is not valid in a voucher request, and
                     any occurrence MUST be ignored";
      }

      refine "voucher/last-renewal-date" {
        description "A last-renewal-date field
                     is not valid in a voucher request, and
                     any occurrence MUST be ignored";
      }

This is, I think, an editorial change.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to