Brian, all
Great reference, thanks for sharing! Quote: "engineers almost immediately recognized that they had misdiagnosed the problem. However, they were unable to resolve the issue by restoring the link, because the network management tools required to do so remotely relied on the same paths they had just disabled”. This is why we need an adaptive, virtually in-band control plane. Programmable, software-driven networks will strongly amplify this effect. To me, out-of-band control plane is a misconception of virtualization 😉 (have 2 networks, use 1), and it must still be adaptive & omnipresent. Also nice: recommendations of the Bureau to the operators. Artur > -----Original Message----- > From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 7:40 PM > To: Anima WG <[email protected]> > Subject: [Anima] A reminder of why we need ANIMA > > Hi ANIMA, > > I think the document below is a timely reminder of why we *need* truly > autonomic networks that are not subject to human misconfiguration errors. > Start reading at "Root Cause and Event Summary". > > Brian > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: how to misconfigurer ospf and take out your cellullar net > Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 09:31:46 +0000 > From: [email protected] > > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-367699A1.docx > > > jon > > > _______________________________________________ > Anima mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
