On 01-Dec-20 12:36, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps there is something we should specify in ANIMA to prevent the > > ANIMA infrastructure falling into this sort of trap: when there is a > > system-wide issue (such as hitting an O/S resource limit everywhere at > > the same time) it also prevents the autonomic mechanisms from working. > > I think you mean, that it should not also prevent the autonomic system? > I think that key is: > 1) allocate resources (including threads) up-front > 2) do not dynamically allocate threads per interface, but rather use async > routines. > > But, I don't know what we could write into the specification to make this > happen. It seems that we really just need smart implementers.
I think the IETF could do better on "Implementation Considerations" in general. For now, I'll make a note to add something in the "Robustness" section of the ASA Guidelines document. Regards Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
