Hi, I'm in favor of adoption. Introducing a cloud registrar also addresses domains with no local registrar to allow pledges to onboard to specific domain.
Best regards Steffen From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sheng Jiang Sent: Mittwoch, 7. April 2021 12:01 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Anima] Adoption call for draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud-04, ends April 20th 2021 Hi, dear ANIMAer, This message starts a two-week adoption call on draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud-04, it ends on April 20th, 2021. draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud has been presented to the WG since September 2019 and the WG showed good interest and had discussions. It was presented several times and had no opposition. The draft is clearly in scope of ANIMA charter and milestones. Giving the dependent BRSKI has passed the IESG evaluation, the chairs feel that it may be the right time to call the adoption. We therefore are asking the ANIMA working group for adoption of the following work: Title: BRSKI Cloud Registrar Name: draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud-04 Authors: O. Friel, R. Shekh-Yusef and M. Richardson URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-friel-anima-brski-cloud/ IPR: No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on draft-richardson-anima-voucher-delegation This document is intended to become a standards track ANIMA WG document. Please express your support or rejection. If you think this document should _not_ be adopted, please also explicitly indicate the reasons. Regards, Sheng
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
