Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> (I continue to argue that COSE-signed-CBOR will be better if doing >> things over native BTLE)
> What is stopping you from fixing this?
1) the use case for operating over native BTLE is not as yet accepted by
brski-async-enroll. The recent discussion about whether we can reuse the
CSR process from sztp is part of that discussion.
2) there are many use cases where BTLE is not involved, and remaining in
a JOSE/JSON ecosystem is very valuable. (Particularly to some
Enterprise/Industrial types who are just replacing COBOL with J2EE)
Having a single format for "everything" is sometimes better than
a super-optimized format for a single edge case, which might not even
be particularly power constrained now.
3) I haven't made enough time for the running code, although I think I can
show something by end of summer.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
