On 5. Jul 2021, at 23:55, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-x509-08.html#Tags > > Does not say anything about the allocation, and it's clearly been more than > two revisions of the document since 2019.
Reinforces the point that only IANA and IESG should ever be allowed to read the IANA considerations — implementers should always be made aware that the truth is in the registry. > It's good to know that it's allocated already. Indeed. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
