On 15-Dec-21 07:43, Michael Richardson wrote:
Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, congratulations on this RFC. Should ANIMA consider an incompatible
> update to RFC8992 to use these new CBOR tags instead of the existing ad
> hoc solution?
Maybe. I'm not sure.
I will see about adapting my implementation and post a further opinion.
> I don't think we have an installed base to worry about, and the
> difference for an implementor is not very big.
Yes, that's true. On the other hand, I'd hardly like to encourage IPv4
ACPs.
I said 8992 and I think you saw 8994...
I agree with you of course, but I wrote 8992 and I think you saw 8994...
Brian
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
