Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > I provided some comments at the end of my review. Briefly, I have doubts > that this > is the best technical approach and so I think if we are to work on this > problem > we should start by working out the problem statement and requirements first.
I would agree with you.
In particular, I think that UPnP or PCP, in combination with some kind
of dynamic DNS infrastructure, could do everything SNIF does, and do it in a
far more decentralized fashion.
So what is it that SNIF does that is truly different?
>> Have the SECDISPATCH chairs put it on the
>> agenda,
> I think putting it on the SECDISPATCH agenda would be appropriate
Good.
>> or is there any agreement that maybe IOTOPS should dispatch it?
> I think that would be a bad idea. There's nothing really IoT-specific
here.
There is often nothing IoT specific about many things.
There is however a community of people who understand the set of tradeoff in
deploying systems at large scale that have no human at the helm.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
