On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:31 PM Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oops, sorry, yes, the service names use -, the . is the coap level > discovery naming. > No idea yet, whether there is an actual need for that difference (still > getting up to > speed with coap). > > Also the current best practice is to deploy these type of TXT records using its own node name, as suggested in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8552 tim
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
