Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that [I-D.richardson-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs] is given as an > Informative reference. Is that OK? It looks to me like it might be > essential reading, and RFC7030 itself [EST] is a normative reference.
Yeah, that might be wrong in the end. RFC7030 will get an Updated By from the draft, so that link might stronger. I'm working on examples, which should be done in a week or so, at which point the document could be adopted by LAMPS. Unfortunately, it would appear that the changes will be bits-on-the-wire changes for the RFC8994 use case. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
