Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: >> I wonder if we could just write some errata on 8990 to explain what to do. >> I'm really skittish about "very brief RFCs"...
> Yes, and suggest to the AD that it should be "Hold for document update".
> Barring anyone else speaking up, I'd be happy with that.
That's what I had in mind.
> Obsoleting an existing format is harder, but an implementation that
> doesn't understand "EST-TLS" could simply ignore it, I suppose.
We defined EST-TLS as the objective for the Join-Proxy discovery of
Registrar, but we left AN_Proxy as empty string.
> (Comment: We didn't design GRASP for constrained environments and
> saving every possible bit on the wire. GRASP-lite, anyone?)
We can make it smaller only really by omitting things/features.
M_FLOODs fit into single 802.15.4 packets already, I think.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
