Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 2.  The other thing we ran into was that the CBOR implementation I'm 
using, when given a
    > DateTime object naturally produces a RFC 8949 Section 3.4.2 compliant 
"tag 1" marked Epoch-Based
    > Date/Time.  And demarshalls this.  So I don't really notice.

    > But, draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor doesn't say much about 
"yang:date-and-time".
    > The only reference seems to be at:
    > 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-20.html#name-the-container-and-other-nod

    > where date-and-time is shown as part of a container object.
    > The Content is defined to be string date pattern.

"created-on"=>"2022-06-17T09:21:32.299Z"

We don't need this much precision either, so I wonder if we can forbid it.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to