On 2022-06-28, at 22:50, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > The alternative would be to trigger on the data, so any string that looks > like 2022-06-28T20:48:15Z would turn into 1(1656449295). That has some > interesting security considerations, though.
Hmm, that is starting to become more attractive to me. As long as we can make sure that the same string comes back out again, this can be safe even if we don’t get the typenames right. Of course an efficient implementation might still be triggered by typenames, but it wouldn’t create a problem if that guesses wrong. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
