Jürgen, you did a great review back in April.

We recently made a bunch of revisions to constrained-join-proxy.
In the end, we have replaced our custom "JPY" encapsulations with a CoAP
header.  The cost in the end is two bytes, and the result is that it is
identical to RFC9031.

We have also changed the MTI.

There is a diff in the DT, and I wonder if you'd take a look at that and give
us your opinion.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to