Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2023-02-25, at 22:52, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> RFC8366.
>>
>> Good idea. Let’s see when I get to it…
> Examples don’t validate.
Yes, I know that the base64 isn't valid. I guess we should have made it
valid base64, even if it was nonsense inside. Putting ten lines of base64
signature in the example in the middle of the text seemed distracting to
readers.
>>> Base64.strict_encode64(Base64.decode64("base64encodedvalue=="))
> => "base64encodedvaluQ==“
> Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
