Hi,

Michael also was somewhat in favor of streamlining but didn't want us to 
rewrite the entire document. That was also not my intention.

I've created a PR with current work in progress/status here: 
https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/pull/271/files 

The only pending item here is review the RPK section and check that all the 
required procedures for it are included. In the new streamlined setup, using 
RPK is a distinct variant described in its own section mostly.
Other sections point to it when needed.

Esko

-----Original Message-----
From: Anima <[email protected]> On Behalf Of William Atwood
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 17:40
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Anima] Idea for streamlining of 
draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher

Dear all,

Given that one of my students is about to start a project that will 
model BRSKI and Constrained BRSKI, I am all in favor of "simplify and 
streamline".

   Bill

On 6/22/2023 10:57 AM, Esko Dijk wrote:
> Attention This email originates from outside the concordia.ca domain. // 
> Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du domaine de concordia.ca
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Based on our writing and implementation experience so far for 
> draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher, I see some opportunity to simplify 
> and streamline the main procedure and its description.
> 
> The idea is to have one main flow description that relies a lot on 
> sensible defaults, and move any “alternatives” or “extras”, or “special 
> cases” to separate sections in the end of the document.
> 
> That should make it more comprehensible for those wanting to implement 
> the basic constrained BRSKI method and also improve interoperability.
> 
> For example quite some CoAP resource discovery things are explained but 
> my implementation doesn’t use it; and it doesn’t seem to add value for 
> the “default” case.
> 
> See https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/269 
> <https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/269 for Github issue 
> created for this.
> 
> I could create a PR to show how it may look like.
> 
> Any opinions on this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Esko
> 
> *IoTconsultancy.nl*  |  Email/Teams: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>    |   +31 6 2385 8339
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

-- 
Dr. J.W. Atwood, Eng.             tel:   +1 (514) 848-2424 x3046
Distinguished Professor Emeritus  fax:   +1 (514) 848-2830
Department of Computer Science
    and Software Engineering
Concordia University ER 1234      email:[email protected]
1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West    http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~bill
Montreal, Quebec Canada H3G 1M8

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to