Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > * Is application/voucher-cose+cbor a correct name? > https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/264 -> proposal is to change name to application/voucher+cose and register -> '+cose" as a structured syntax suffix. A request has been informally -> approved by mediaman WG; and it was decided to include the formal -> request in the draft since that's the best procedure for it.
Was it actually informally approved? I didn't know. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/?gbt=1&index=JxzT03Dhe7Nt8cPAfjbDx3WVQRM > * Proposed simplification and streamlining of Constrained BRSKI > https://github.com/anima-wg/constrained-voucher/issues/269 -> proposal is to simplify and streamline the draft per the PR linked to -> this issue. It separates better the default (basics) needed and -> optional Pledge features (like discovering multiple -> protocols/formats/etc and the RPK variant) > Maybe Michael is available to lead the discussion ... ? okay, I'll make a slide for each point from there. I don't mind the rewrites you intend, and I don't find them controversial, and at this point, I think you hold the lead pen, so I'd encourage you to just do them. This document is now like 6+ years old, and it would be nice to get it done already. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
