Hi Brian,

There is ongoing work in the ANIMA design team about the extension of the 
discovery information for a registrar, to contain more information about 
specific features of the registrar. We currently identified:
- the operational mode: registrar as responder (as in RFC 8995) or pledge as 
responder (as in BRSKI-PRM)
- the enrollment protocol: EST as in RFC 8995) or CMP (as in BRSIK-AE) or 
future adaptations
- the voucher format: CMS-signed JSON (as in RFC 8995) or JOSE-signed JSON (as 
in JWS-Voucher used in BRSKI-PRM

The discussion is to define TXT key value pairs for DNS-SD, and use this 
approach also for GRASP.

Best regards
Steffen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 11:47 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Fries, Steffen (T CST) <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Anima] New Version of draft-eckert-anima-grasp-dnssd
> 
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
>     > I can't answer that, but note that the AN_Proxy and AN_join_registrar
>     > GRASP objectives defined in RFC 8995 include an objective-value field.
>     > For AN_Proxy that field is "any" so is currently undefined and could be
>     > extended in any way we want. For AN_join_registrar it is defined as
> 
> In hindsight, 8995 should have created an IANA registry for these.
> 
>     > I find that "(list of)" a bit unclear but again there is flexibility to
>     > extend the semantics as we want. In fact that "(list of)" is almost
>     > worth an errata, since I wouldn't know what to write in a program to
>     > implement it.
> 
> :-)
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to