Thanks for making the updates to the text! I did see that the numbering for the
References section seems to have disappeared; and there is one mention of "MUST
never" that ought to be "MUST NOT".
Ok for me to conclude WGLC and the draft can now move forward.
Esko
-----Original Message-----
From: Anima <anima-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 17:38
To: anima@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Anima] I-D Action: draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-08.txt
internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-anima-brski-cloud-08
This is the result of WGLC review comments from Esko (THANK YOU!)
There are no semantic changes to the document, just edits for consistency.
Is the WGLC finished then?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
Anima@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
