Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Check the GRASP text in both drafts, i think the text in > constrained-join-proxy is more harmfull to move forward than the one in > constrained-voucher. So i would definitely like to see it removed, or i > would want to raise concerns about it (which i think we don't need to > spend time on to get the constrained docs out the door):
okay. I won't get rfc8366bis to/past WGLC before January-ish, so everything is going to wait for that anyway. If we can sort other things out at the same time, then I'm all for that. I want to say that the first constrained-voucher interop work was in Prague IETF... 2019. _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
