Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 3) address of renewal server could be pushed into the device via a
    > higher-layer communication i.e. the application layer.  This "push"
    > could happen at the moment that the device is requested to re-enroll
    > itself, in some application-specific way.  There's currently no
    > standard protocol message defined AFAIK to trigger a client to start
    > the re-enrollment process.

It's probably a bug.
BRSKI-AE could support a push, and I think that each of OPC UA, and MATTER
also support a push operation.

CoJP (RFC9031) includes a mechanism to rekey the network that is push.
The problem/reason we have no push mechanism is that we (the IETF) don't
really have a standard datamodel/interface-to-device, while other SDO
verticals do.  So adding a new push mechanism is not a big deal.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to