Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Wrt. the process: As a reviewer, keeping everything in a single file is > always easier than breaking it up into issues. Especially because the > more you revisit a document, the more you go back and forth and maybe > delete comments or change them.
I don't mind it as a single file, although the parts with no comments, maybe
could be removed if file size is an issue.
> I think i should have created the tags for each review point that would
> have allowed to auto-create github issues from them. I remember that
> someone in IESG did provide such feedback, but i could not find it
> again. WOuld be nice to have a very simple way to find such a preferred
> tagging method documented on authors.ietf.org..
That was Lars, and the tool is https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
As I said, it didn't work for me last time I tried, but that was many months
ago.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
